Thomas George -
Former Lakewood Mayor
Download
the deposition (.PDF)
Back
On why he assigned Sgt. Edward Favre to the mayor's office:
A: Why did I
request Edward Favre to be assigned to my office? I have known Ed
professionally for sometime. And he's very active in the Lakewood
community and he -- his background in law enforcement I felt would be
an asset to the administration.
On how often he communicated with Sgt. Favre:
Q: Did Sergeant
Favre have an office near yours?
A: His office was on the other side of my office.
Q: Right next door to you?
A: Across the -- within the same office.
Q: Would you talk regularly about issues that he was handling for your
office?
A: Surprisingly, I would sometimes go three, four, five days without
talking to Ed.
On his administration's policy towards the youth re-entry program:
Q: Was there any
policy in place from you, directed by you and handled by Ed Favre with
respect to the Youth Re-entry Program and whether it should or should
not stay in the City of Lakewood?
A: Yeah. Yes, there was.
Q: What was that policy?
A: That was if the Youth Re-entry Program needed -- either stayed in
Lakewood or if it needed to move, it would be relocated within the city.
At a testy moment, on his civil rights bona fides:
A: Can I tell him
about my civil rights record or should we --
Q: Oh, by all means, tell me about your civil rights record.
A: You want me to show pictures of having Peter Lawson Jones swear me
in as --
Q: Is that part of your civil rights record, that you were sworn in by
Peter Lawson Jones?
A: If let me finish.
Q: Okay.
A: I was also the foreleader for Stephanie Tubbs-Jones when she was
elected county prosecutor. I worked on Lee Fisher's staff to implement
various civil rights initiatives in the Attorney General's office.
Q: Anything else?
A: There's plenty.
On the letter he signed threatening to remove the program from Lakewood:
Q: If you look at
the second page at the bottom, it says, "Fair warning: As of this date
because of my concerns that the LMM Youth Re-entry Program is not
performing as presented last February and that the prognosis for
improvement is poor, I want you to know I will seek to have the program
removed from Lakewood at the earliest possible time." So was that the
policy of your administration as of February 2007?
A: Let me first be clear. I never have, to this day, completely read
this letter. I can distinctly remember it was a very busy day and I was
just asked to sign it. I believe that that letter should be taken in
its totality.
Q: Was it your practice as the Mayor to sign letters like this that
reflect administration policy without reading them?
A: We get over -- we calculate about 10,000 phone calls a month in the
Mayor's office, countless communications, letters, policy procedures,
practices, whatever. I very routinely signed this letter and many,
many, many others.
Q: Is it your testimony that even though you said that you wanted them
that you were going to remove them from Lakewood at the earliest
possible time that you really didn't mean that?
A: I can just speculate that it was just saber rattling.
Q: Meaning you really didn't mean it?
A: That would be my assumption.
Q: By saber rattling, did you hope that they would voluntarily leave?
A: I would guess we're just looking for a response. My understanding
was there'd been somewhat of a communications breakdown. Didn't this
take place after a meeting or did it precipitate the meeting?
Q: You had a meeting May 16, 2007.
On his plan of action after the May 16, 2007 meeting:
Q: Do you have a
recollection then what your plan of action was going be following this
May 16, 2007 meeting?
A: First, let me qualify by saying there is and always is a lot on the
table of any Mayor. And I can't emphasize that enough. I don't know at
that point -- you know, this had been an ongoing situation as literally
dozens of other situations and issues that are going on simultaneously
within the city, I'm not quite sure what our next step was at this
point. I think that a lot of what probably was going through my mind
was just sit through the meeting, and hope for the best, and hope that
the meeting was productive and the exchange of ideas was useful.
Q: Do you have a recollection after this meeting of the administration
making a decision that you would begin to apply pressure to the Youth
Re-entry Program?
A: That was not a stated policy of the administration.
On his perception of the joint departmental inspection of Hidden
Village:
A: What I was
getting at is I saw it as a police response.
Q: You saw the raid on May 22nd, the joint departmental raid, as a
police response?
A: That's how I perceived it.